Those Sorbus hybrids were bred by in Russia by Ivan Michurin. Are they suggesting that ‘Viking’ was an unintended or open pollinated backcross? If there had been some intention at play, why would they be trying to guess?
There are other Sorbus hybrids bred by Michurin, including several Sorbus x Mespilus. Also, there are historical chance hybrids of Sorbus x Pyrus. I’ve not heard of any of these freely crossing with their parent. I’ve been curious about them for a while, and may try to get some from GRIN at some point for evaluation. I do have a Shipova tree. It hasn’t flowered or fruited, and is known to be shy bearing from what I’ve read.
I’ve tried plenty of wild Aronia. The fruit is juicy but quite tannic. I dont believe it to be markedly less tannic than cultivated selections of Sorbus. I guess I don’t see the logic there, as it sounds like they’re saying that Aronia on its own isn’t full of tannin.
I’d also question the validity of this observation. In my observations, the range of phenotypes of this supposed single species- Aronia melanocarpa- is quite varied. Sure, they are common in wetlands, etc. But I’ve observed upland forms in several locales. This is a common feature of many wetland plants, that they can often ironically be found in very dry places. It makes sense if you think of it terms of stress tolerance as opposed to the more commonly held view that a given plant prefers excess water, or lack of water, etc.
In the Adirondacks, a dwarf suckering form is very common, often growing with wintergreen and bunchberry on very shallow marginal acidic soil. It is wiry and has very little vigor. It bears small quantities of very small fruits from its sparse widely spaced stems. I have specimens here that were collected from that area. Another sort I’ve observed has a similar habit as lowbush blueberry. Much of the upper 1/2 of Mt. Monadnock, a popular and beautiful solitary peak in SW New Hampshire is carpeted with this lowbush type of Aronia that grows directly on bedrock outcrops. It’s stem density is very high, and forms dense pure stands that blanket the knobby granite. I haven’t tried the fruit, but I’ve seen it flower.
McKenzie Aronia, meanwhile, has a clumping habit and gets perhaps 10-12’ tall, from what I understand. Mine are more like 7’. It’s berries are quite good, IMO at least as large and tasty as Viking or Nero, and you can (or at least could) buy it in conservation grade bundles for shelter belt plantings, etc. I had ‘Viking’ and ‘Nero’ at one point too, but they didn’t appreciate the care I gave them, and I’ve either lost track of them or they’ve died. McKenzie is tough and the extra vigor makes it easier to propagate and establish.