Why don’t we hear more about 9 Pajam 2 root stock? It almost sounds disease proof.
I think in the USA it’s generally not ‘stooled’ by vendors that sell to the public. But that might not be the case in Europe? No other thoughts on it.
it might be, because it is the most vigorous of the m9 clones?
Also i have not seen any sources claiming cepiland to be disease proof? Why do you think that? Or do you have a link so i can read further?
https://apples.extension.org/apple-rootstock-info-m-9/
also mentions Pajam 2
Jon Clements of UMass has made mention of Pajam 2 on occasion.
I will try and find the link for you.
Dear Oscar, this is what I found.
9 Pajam 2 rootstock vigor class is G. 214, which Fazio described as highly yield efficient and productive with yields of 100 to 125 percent of M. 9 in most U.S. trials. It is precocious, resistant to firelight, crown rot, and woolly apple aphid, and propagates well in the stool bed.