Not sure a BBC infotainment show is the best evidence to make your case.
I… disagree. I maintain there is a compelling case that, while high organic matter does increase a number of soil characteristics in ways that benefit gardening, it is neither always practical nor a be-all end-all.
fruitnut pointed out quite well how overly rich organic soils tend to result in excess vigor and poor fruit quality. I’ve also mentioned or alluded to the fact that organic matter can also increase the chances of and duration of waterlogging.
That higher degree of waterlogging might not be an issue in the mountains of West Virginia, for example, but for those interested in growing opuntia, citrus, agaves, pretty much any Chilean, Australian, or South African plant, or even just olives, pomegranates, or capers, that excess organic matter and free moisture is a serious issue.
And that is leaving aside the question of practicality. I regularly apply compost, manure, and mulch to my garden and landscaping in roughly three quarter ton loads (that’s about what my trailer carries, and we’re talking dozens of trips) and by the next year or even the end of summer, it’s just… gone. It’s not really in the soil either, the soil, except in very wet areas, only gets but so dark. In my climate, mulch and compost become CO2 really quickly. And CO2 doesn’t do squat for the soil.
Again, hence why I brought up volcanic soils (and things that imitate some of the chemical and physical characteristics of volcanic soils, like perlite, expanded slate, “biochar” aka charcoal, etc), because many of the benefits of higher organic matter can be achieved through other means.