I can’t really answer your question from direct experience because my pear trees are still young. But I can give some insights.
Because of fireblight pressure in the South, and to promote earlier fruiting, I bend branches whenever possible rather than prune them off, and I do almost all my pruning in winter, when fireblight infection is not a concern. This tends to make my trees rather wide, as I bend down the long shoots that reach for the sky during the growing season, hinging them if necessary to turn them into laterals in order to keep the tree low and make harvesting easier.
For an example on callery rootstock, I have a Shinko and a couple of KGs on their fourth leaf. The Shinko is about 6 feet tall and maybe 10 feet wide (note that a lot of this width is unbranched, single-season stem growth bent laterally). The KGs are a little bit smaller, at about the same height and 6 to 8 feet wide. (Note that my Shinko started out with better roots and a slightly thicker caliper, so that is the likely explanation for its larger size.) In my climate, it is no problem for any of the Asians on callery to push 6’+ of vertical growth in a couple of months in the growing season, without fertilization.
As another data point, I have Daisui Li and Shin Li (Asian hybrids) on OHxF-87. They are considerably less vigorous and by mass of wood, I’d guess they are no more than a quarter of the size of the Asians on callery that are on their same season. However, it’s not an apples-to-apples comparison because both of these trees suffered due to persistent deer attacks (the deer really wanted these particular trees and partially broke through my caging to damage them). That said, the amount of growth that they push in a season, stem by stem, is less than half of what the trees on callery push.
I have several European pears (including Warren and Ayers) on callery, and they are very vigorous, with maybe 8’ of shoot growth in a season. I have Potomac (a European pear that is generally considered vigorous, or at least more vigorous than Warren) on OHxF-87, and it has grown far less.
I have trees on OHxF-97 and betulifolia, but they were planted more recently. So far, they each seem to be as vigorous as callery.
I think a lot of the difference between the vigor of OHxF-87 and callery in my location has to do with my soil (heavy clay) and with callery’s particular resilience to less-than-ideal conditions. For instance, I do not generally water my trees, and even though my region in the South is usually humid, there can be dry spells in summer. Callery is probably more tolerant of both very wet conditions (like the very wet early springs where the soil stays saturated with water for long periods) as well as periods of relative drought, and just continues to grow. I suspect that the difference in apparent vigor between the two rootstocks would be narrower if my trees were kept in more ideal conditions.
As far as total size is concerned, pears – especially Asians – will tend to slow down quite a bit once they enter full fruit production. My Shinko has already started fruiting and my other Asians have produced a lot of flower buds. But total potential size is going to be very different in different regions – the longer growing season of the South and relatively mild conditions (save for disease) will probably mean that my trees will top out larger than if they were grown in Massachusetts. Either way, at this point, I’m not too concerned about keeping them manageable just with branch bending and winter pruning.
On the other hand, these Asian pear trees – in an old orchard in China – have certainly gotten pretty large, but they are reportedly over 100 years old and in their native growing conditions:
Source:
Old pear trees generate new revenues in Hebei - Chinadaily.com.cn