Ok, but…once again you are addressing only the transmitter, not the receiver, and not all heat is the same. My primary concern is not how much of the power consumed is turned into heat. My concern is how much of the energy transmitted by the light is used by the plant for photosynthesis. Photosynthesis is the process of converting radiant energy into chemical energy for use in the plant.
This radiant energy diminishes by the distance squared. When a light emits a lot of convective heat, it needs to be kept far enough from the pant that the convective heat does not have a negative impact on the plant. Humidity and other things come into play, but in general, if you put a light that produces a lot of convective heat too close to a seedling, it will dry out and die.
So, when zendog does the “touch test”, it is a good proxy for the amount of convective heat that is produced (even though he is actually estimating conduction). It is good enough for my purposes so that I know I’ll be able to hang the lights with similar proximity.
Since we all know that LED lights are generally more power efficient (more lumens/watt), we get the side benefit of lower energy consumption over all, meaning less total heat (energy), with roughly the same lumens produced. I simply wanted to verify that these tubes would not need to be kept further away. I know when I replaced some can flood lights with LEDs, while they were not even close to the heat of the incandescent floods, when unscrewing an LED that had been on for a while, I was surprised how warm the unit was. I presume it was an inefficiency in the conversion in those early lights.
Not disagreeing with your statement, simply trying to make clear for folks what is important in my application and why I was asking.