Hi @Hillbillyhort, while you can graft jujuba/spinosa onto mauritiania, i agree with @Brace that mauritania won’t be able to deal with cold winters in higher latitudes.
And yes, there is a huge difference between the cold-tolerance of these two species. I have heard of mauritiana’s being grown in deep southeast and deep southwest, there is even one nursery in arizona that claims mauritiana’s being superior to jujubas in eating quality(both species may be grown there). While mauritiana’s are more juicy, i personally prefer jujubas over mauritiana’s by a wide margin. Jujuba’s can survive -20F(mauritiana’s will succumb to a prolonged 32F), and if you grow jujuba’s as self-rooted specimens, many will likely survive colder than -20F, as die-back won’t be a problem
since can regenerate from roots and continue bear desirable fruits. All of their suckers can simply just be dug up and given away/sold for top-dollar. Jujubes(being so tough) are actually more in-demand(and currently very rare) if growing on own roots. It is probably the only fruit species that carries a premium for not being grafted, even though the logistics of grafting entails cost of materials and cost of labor-- and made more expensive by graft failures…
anyway, spinosa-types(wild-type jujubas) are supposedly tougher than domesticated jujuba’s when it comes to cold tolerance and will make excellent rootstock to graft on, their toughness is a boon and a bane at the same time. Yes, being practically indestructible, they will present themselves indefinitely with plenty branches to graft over should die-back of desirable cultivars ensue due to cold weather. But it can be invasive, especially if main grafts die-back as this would stimulate suckering. While spinosa’s are of the same species as jujuba’s-- the taxonomists agreed to christen spinosa with that name due to the spiny growth habits.
some domesticated jujubas actually have longer thorns than spinosa’s, but it is not the longer thorns that will get you(mainly because you can see them), instead it will be the tiny acutely-angled hooks and glochid-like spines borne on spinosa-types.
Spinosa-types can have these tiny spines and hooks even on their deciduous/herbaceous(fruit-bearing) stems. A trait i rarely see among domesticated cultivars(Li will sometimes have these, but only occasionally as most of its herbaceous stems are spineless/hookless)
And being hard-to-kill and having long-reaching roots, will evolve into extremely long-lived thorny thickets bearing tiny, sour fruits. The other name of spinosa is acidojujuba.
definitely compatible, but there are at least 20 spinosa cultivars(and probably 100+ cultivars of domestic jujubas), and while compatible, little is known about long-term compatibility. Here in vegas, i grafted li onto a random spinosa-type seed that i grew for rootstock. Planted it at a friend’s yard several years ago, and while the li grew some 3 or 4 feet. The very spiny rootstock would always overtake the li-graft in growth and even when grafted it over with sihong(which usually dominates growth), both the sihong and the li grafts languished and the rootstock would keep growing side-branches, and much faster than the grafts(most rootstock will yield apical dominance to their grafts if grafts are on upright stems). Anyway, evidently just an isolated/individual incompatibility, but had i planted that in, say, Houston area where there is ample rain and wide open space, it can pose a serious problem as the spiny rootstock would dominate in feral or even semi-feral circumstances.
after all have written above, have to say that if you are in hurry to grow rootstock, yes, spinosa seed will be the most available and ready to use due to seed viability and prodigious fruiting of spinosa-types(this is what virtually all nurseries use to mass-propagate juju cultivars).
have donated spinosa-type pits in great numbers. While felt good about what convenience it provides recipients, also feel bad about implications. The most advisable would be to mass-produce desirable cultivars on their own-roots, which will not only serve as stand-alone trees that can regenerate from roots, but may also serve as rootstock for other desirable cultivars without being paranoid about future problems inherent to spinosa-types