I was scouring the internet this morning, looking for information on some obscure plum varieties, when I happened upon this interesting document
Fruit Tree Data_USDA WY.pdf (3.6 MB)
It contains the most-comprehensive set of data for fruit tree survival and production I have ever seen. They tested many thousands of fruit trees and recorded detailed data: bloom dates, harvest dates, production weights, growth, how often fruiting was successful, etc. Unfortunately, the data is poorly formatted. I spent some time re-formatting the plum data into a sortable table: Plum Data_USDA Cheyenne, WY_shared - Google Sheets
Plum Data_USDA Cheyenne, WY_shared .xlsx (47.2 KB)
There’s also lots of apple, pear, and cherry data, so, if someone is feeling interested and charitable, they can compile and post those.
I think this is particularly useful data because of the climate of the test site. Wyoming is quite arid, and they split tested between irrigated and not irrigated, so the non-irrigated trials show whether a variety is drought tolerant. The site is now zone 5a, but it was 4b-5a during the trial period (climate change). During the trials, temperatures dropped to -27* F (1942, 1951, 1963) on multiple occasions, and -34* F (1936) at the beginning of trials. So, any tree that survived long-term during these trials is clearly quite cold-hardy.
I think it’s interesting how poorly most varieties performed. Of ~400 varieties tested, only ~50 averaged more than 15 pounds of production per year. Of those, the only that I recognized as still commercially available were Pembina, La Crescent, Kahinta, Waneta, Ivanovka, Damsons, Compass, Mt. Royal, and Yakima. Many of the other varieties are now lost to time.