in a 2012 japan study, researchers took pollen from ficus erecta and put it in the ficus carica figs of 4 different cultivars… ‘masui dauphine’, ‘houraishi’, ‘ischia black’, and ‘boldido negra’…
Shortly after the cotyledons emerged, many of the seedlings prematurely developed three or four true leaves, and then stopped growing and died. Therefore, the number of surviving hybrid seedlings was very low 1 year after sowing (Table 1). Many of the hybrid seedlings that did survive showed weak growth (Fig. 1b) such as those from the interspecific hybrid between ‘Ischia Black’ and F. erecta. On the other hand, some hybrid seedlings, especially those of ‘Boldido Negra’ x F. erecta, had comparatively vigorous growth (Fig. 1a) and lived for more than 4 years.
that’s a serious disparity in cross-compatibility. but why?
check out this 30 year old paper by william ramírez-benavides of the university of costa rica…
Hybridization of Ficus religiosa with F. septica and F. aurea (Moraceae)
in florida, natural hybrids between ficus religiosa and ficus aurea were found.
and in the philippines, natural hybrids between ficus religiosa and ficus septica were found.
turns out that most ficus species are 2n x 26. basically they have the same chromosome number. so in theory it should be possible to cross quite a few of them.
except, can we say it’s possible to cross carica and erecta? well…
maybe it will help to try and visualize things…
carica’s shape reflects the fact that some carica cultivars are a lot closer to erecta than others. boldido negra is close enough to erecta that crossing them produces relatively vigorous offspring. whichever carica cultivar is the furthest from erecta won’t produce any offspring. compatibility is a continuum.
what about erecta’s shape? from wikipedia, erecta is distributed from eastern Himalayas, Assam, Bangladesh, Vietnam, southern China, Taiwan, Jeju Island of South Korea, the Ryukyu Islands, and Japan. clearly each country’s erecta can’t be equally compatible with boldido negra or any other carica cultivar. the bigger the disparity in compatibility, the bigger the shape of erecta relative to carica’s shape.
i included the shape of ficus septica. its location (completely arbitrary) would mean that it’s more compatible with carica than erecta. but perhaps its too far from carica to produce viable offspring.
one shape i’d really love to see is that of ficus pungens. this species has very long hanging clusters of small figs. if it could be successfully crossed with carica, what would the hybrid look like?
imagine living 2000 years ago. each continent in the world had a shape, and you might wonder about their shapes, but you couldn’t see them. the shapes were unseen, hidden, unknown. but now, 2000 years later, all the continent shapes are known, thanks to countless brave explores and cartographers.
each ficus species has a compatibility shape, and i wonder about their shapes, but i can’t see them. their shapes are unseen, hidden, unknown. how many years until all the ficus compatibility shapes are known, thanks to countless brave hybridizers and “cartographers”?
just like each ficus has a compatibility shape, and each continent has a shape, demand also has a shape. what’s the shape of the demand for a fig category on this forum? the shape is determined by 2 things… 1. the number of people willing to donate for a fig category, and 2. the amount of money each person is willing to donate. this shape exists, but we can’t see it.
what if we used voting to decide whether a fig category should be created? if we did so then we wouldn’t uncover a shape, we’d uncover the length of a line. well, if only one person voted for a fig category it wouldn’t even be a line. it would just be a point. in order for it to be a line at least two people would need to vote. the more people who voted, the longer the line. a long line of people want something for free? how is this useful to know? it really isn’t.
if only one person donates for a fig category it wouldn’t create a shape, but it would create a line. how long would the line be? how big of a sacrifice is this individual willing to make for a fig category? this is useful to know. if this individual is willing to make a big sacrifice, then it’s worth figuring out if they are crazy or if they know something that we do not.
don quixote was willing to make a big sacrifice of time and energy attacking windmills because he thought they were giants. obviously he was just crazy. except, maybe he wasn’t crazy. maybe his eyes worked better than everyone else’s eyes. but it just seems highly unlikely. imagine how different the story would have been if he had only been able to see the giants thanks to special glasses.
just recently a new fig forum was created… figfanatic. it was created as a result of a big disagreement with a big decision made by the owner of the old fig forum… ourfigs. just like growingfruit was created as a result of a big disagreement with a big decision made by the owner of gardenweb. all these decisions were made without seeing or knowing the shape of the demand. same with the decision to create a category for cider on this forum. the decision could have been made based on demand, but it wasn’t.
@Richard is currently researching the genetics of ficus johannis, which is very closely related to carica. if this forum had a category for ficus, would he have used it to help find samples of johannis to do dna tests on? i dunno.
the fig cambrian explosion hasn’t happened. it will happen if lots of people start making lots of fig crosses. this is more likely to happen if there’s a category for figs on this forum, which should only exist if there’s enough demand for it.